April 28, 2006

Bonfire of the Brands

I have been topping up my self-esteem and my social status by buying the right branded things, so that I feel good about myself, so that people can know who I am. In my world, the implications of wearing a crocodile as opposed to a polo player on the breast of one’s shirt are of crucial importance. Understanding the differences between Dualit and Dyson, and what they say about their owners is reflection of style and good taste.

By now you’re thinking that I am a particularly shallow individual and, to a certain extent, you’d be right. But I think that in small ways, we all behave like this in our daily lives. A stranger waves as they drive past in the same model car as our own. Snap judgments are made on youths dressed in white Reeboks and hoodies. That little bit extra spent on our favourite name brands in the supermarket is a small price to pay because we’re worth it.

Being the gullible fool that I am, I believed in the promises that these brands made to me; that I would be more attractive, more successful, more happy for buying their stuff. However, the highs of consumerism have been accompanied by a continual, dull ache, growing slowly as the years have gone by; a melancholy that until recently I could not understand.

I now realise that…

Continue reading “Bonfire of the Brands”

April 27, 2006

Ugly Betty

Look Homely, Angel

ABC’s ‘Ugly Betty’ Is Plainly Lovable
By Tom Shales, Washington Post

“Ugly Betty” isn’t just entertainment, it’s therapy. Nirvana therapy. It’s happiness in a tube, or rather The Tube. It’s a pint of Ben & Jerry’s with no fat or calories. It’s tuning in to “The View” to discover they all have laryngitis. It’s Florida without those disgusting bugs.

Mostly, it’s getting even with anyone who ever rejected your proposal of lunch, dinner, a movie or marriage because they thought you weren’t good enough.

The heroine of “Ugly Betty,” as the title does considerably more than imply, is not by traditional or contemporary standards a raving beauty. But she’s a beautiful person just the same and you might be raving once you meet her.

Continue reading…

April 26, 2006

Channel Zero: Life Without Television

Channel Zero
Television? Not on Their Watch.
By Korin Miller, Washington Post

Nell Triplett’s Woodley Park living room is filled with the usual suspects: couch, coffee table, bookshelf and cozy fireplace. But there’s one notable absence. “I’ve never had a television,” she says. No TV? Anywhere in the apartment? Doesn’t she know the latest about Kate and Sawyer’s “Lost” romance, or Meredith and McDreamy on “Grey’s Anatomy”? Nope. She doesn’t watch either one. The latest straining hopeful to be booted off “American Idol”? No clue.

Instead, she takes yoga, salsa dancing and French classes in the evenings. She plays the violin, reads a lot and trains for a marathon. Triplett, 25, says people give her a funny look when they learn of her TV-free life: “They always ask me how I live without it…but I’ve never even considered owning one.”

For many of us, television plays a big role in the way we live. At home, living rooms gave way to family rooms that gave way to media rooms. Reading chairs begat easy chairs that begat recliners, now with remote control and beer cooler built in. And then there’s the endless programming, from ESPN to HBO to MTV, presented on flat screens, projector screens, HDTV with surround sound. Why would—how could—anyone do without?

Not many people do. According to a Census Bureau study, 98.2 percent of U.S. households in 2004 had televisions, averaging 2.8 sets per home. But there is a minuscule group of Americans who just say no to television.

Their reasons vary: Some, like Triplett, never had a TV growing up. Some think the shows are not worth their time. Others simply find television too distracting. Whatever the rationale, life without TV is a rarity.

“To aggressively not have a TV is to take yourself out of the loop of American cultural conversation,” says Robert J. Thompson, director of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University. He says people are often shocked, then reverential upon learning of someone’s TV-free lifestyle.

Continue reading “Channel Zero”

April 25, 2006

The Monastic Option

“There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part; you can’t even passively take part. You’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop. And you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it that, unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!” —Mario Savio

###

“I am referring to a group of individuals, specifically, monks—who were not able to fit into the disintegrating landscape of the Roman Empire and who experienced themselves as strangers in a strange land. What Roman culture had discarded, these monks treated as valuable; what the culture found worthwhile, they perceived as stupid or destructive.

And so, beginning in the fourth century A.D., these men took it upon themselves to preserve the treasures of Greco-Roman civilization as the lights of their own culture were rapidly fading. In Ireland, and on the Continent, they sequestered and copied the books and manuscripts that represented the greatest cultural achievements of that civilization—material that, six hundred years later, proved to be a crucial factor in the dawn of a new European culture.

When I speak of a contemporary class of monks, I do not, of course, mean that literally. I am not talking about asceticism or religious practice and certainly not organization into monastic orders. But I am talking about renunciation. Today’s ‘monk’ is determined to resist the spin and hype of the global corporate world order; he or she knows the difference between reality and theme parks, integrity and commercial promotion. He regards Starbucks as a sad plastic replica of the gritty (or bohemian) cafe of bygone days.

She has no truck with the trendy ‘wisdom’ of the New Age, and instead seeks guidance about the human condition from Flaubert or Virginia Woolf rather than the latest guru tossed up by the media or counterculture. Computers and the Internet are, for such a person, useful tools, not a way of life, and she understands that both the Republican and Democratic parties represent corporate interests, rather than genuine democracy.

She has no problem being labeled an elitist, because she agrees with Garrison Keillor that ‘what’s really snooty is to put out commercial garbage for an audience that you yourself feel superior to.’ The new monk is a sacred/secular humanist, dedicated not to slogans or the fashionable patois of postmodernism, but to Enlightenment values that lie at the heart of our civilization: the disinterested pursuit of the truth, the cultivation of art, the commitment to critical thinking.

Above all, he knows the difference between quality and kitsch, and he seeks to preserve the former in the teeth of a culture that is drowning in the latter. If she is a high school teacher, she has her class reading the Odyssey, despite the fact that half the teachers in the school have assigned Danielle Steel. If he is a writer, he writes for posterity, not for the best-seller lists. As a mother, she takes her kids camping or to art museums, not to Pocahontas. He elects, in short, to save his life via the monastic option.”

—Morris Berman, “Twilight of American Culture”

The Decline and Fall of the Private Self

“Once upon a time, people kept secrets. Today’s tell-all bloggers and MySpace denizens have made the notion of a guarded personal life feel obsolete. What effect does such exposure have on the psyche? For every citizen who employs freedom of speech to the hilt, there’s someone equally determined to keep a few gems—or at least trysts—to herself.”

Internet Friends

The Decline and Fall of the Private Self